Colorado Bill To Reduce Some Drug Offenses Under Fire
The Denver Post
Prosecutors and sheriffs across Colorado
are upset about a bill in the state legislature that would reduce the
crime of possessing small quantities of some drugs from a felony to a
misdemeanor — a move they say would be a financial nightmare.
But
supporters of Senate Bill 163 say the legislation is a way to get
chronic drug users treatment rather than prison terms and felony
convictions that condemn them to a life of poverty and hopelessness.
Denver
District Attorney Mitch Morrissey said the bill would kill the city's
successful drug court and could drive up the cost of dealing with petty
drug offenders.
"And it has a fiscal impact from anywhere from
$3 million to $5 million for a city that has had to cut budgets for the
past three to four years," Morrissey said.
Mesa County officials
say that jail costs would climb by more than $400,000 a year for a
sheriff's office that had to lay off 33 people last year.
Mesa
County Chief Deputy District Attorney Dan Rubinstein says there are
studies that show the consequences of a felony are effective in
encouraging drug abusers to find treatment. Plus, he said the
downgrading of charges is the "wrong message to send to our citizens
that these drugs shouldn't be taken seriously."
But one of the
bill's sponsors, Sen. Pat Steadman, D-Denver, said the bill's purpose is
to better help drug users find treatment and supervision that would be
more effective than the current system of "escalating punishments that
often result in a prison sentence."
The bill would reduce the
penalty for possession of 4 grams or less of certain drugs from a Class 6
felony to a Class 1 misdemeanor and reduce possession of more than 4
grams of those drugs from a Class 4 felony to Class 6. Savings
generated would be routed to drug treatment.
According to a fiscal analysis of the bill, about $2.2 million would be transferred to drug treatment in its first full year.
Drug-dealing and -manufacturing remain felonies.
Support
is coming from the Colorado Criminal Defense Foundation, the
Criminal Justice Reform Coalition and the Independence Institute.
"There
are 20 states who have misdemeanors for low-level possession," said
Christie Donner, director of the Colorado Criminal Justice Reform
Coalition. "It is not radical. We are trying to do a
justice-reinvestment strategy, which is to identify ways you can reduce
the prison population, capture those dollars and put it into strategies
that we know reduce crime and recidivism."
Opponents include
Colorado Attorney General John Suthers, the Colorado District Attorneys
Council and the Colorado Methamphetamine Task Force.
Morrissey
said it is a myth that drug offenders disproportionately go to prison,
especially in Denver, which has one-third of the state's drug cases.
Of
more than 420 drug offenders prosecuted in Denver in 2011 for a Class 6
felony, 21 went to prison. Twenty of those convicts had felonies
other than the drug charge. And only one of those was convicted for
simple possession. That person had an extensive criminal history,
Morrissey said.
The biggest problem with the bill, he said, is
drug offenders wouldn't be able to access Denver's drug court — which is
part of Denver District Court, not County Court, which is separate.
Morrissey
said he does not have the authority to file misdemeanors directly into
District Court — thus those offenders wouldn't be eligible for Denver's
drug court.
Denver Mayor Michael Hancock, through a spokeswoman,
said the city has yet to take a stand on the bill but doesn't like its
current language "due to the projected fiscal impacts on the city and
the disruption on the effective drug-court strategies currently in
place."
Co-sponsor Steadman said the bill is based on evidence of what works.
"The
money we spend on prison cells is not well-spent when you are talking
about people with drug addiction," he said. "When you keep people in the
community and in treatment, they don't cost taxpayers the money of a
prison bed, and they can get the help they need."
1 comment:
And once this law goes into effect... People that would have been charged with possession will now be charged with distribution... Just watch the numbers!!!!
Post a Comment