Pot Law Stirring Up Trouble
Hayley Jaqua has a big problem. Jaqua is a 25-year-old full-time student at Metropolitan State College of Denver and an anthropology major who also works part time at a trendy restaurant on the 16th Street Mall. In September, Jaqua was ticketed for possessing a small amount of marijuana. I've spoken to Jaqua only once, so I dare not vouch for the incorruptibility of her soul. But from what I can tell, we have a pleasant and bright person here - a woman whose only brush with the law before this incident was an improperly licensed dog in 2003. Jaqua's petty offense carries with it a maximum fine of $100. Not a huge deal, to be sure. But the long-term consequences of this transgression could be life-changing. According to the Higher Education Act's aid elimination penalty provision - passed through Congress without any debate in 1998 - a student must check off a box on financial aid applications, revealing any drug offenses. A check could mean no college aid. There is no box for "child molestation" or "arson" or "racketeering" or ... well, you get the point. As Jaqua's education relies on financial aid, pleading guilty and paying a trivial marijuana-possession citation is not an uncomplicated matter. Marijuana-legalization advocates claim that more than 200,000 students have lost out on financial aid for this reason since 1998. Since I'm reflexively skeptical of any advocate's claims, let's cut the number by a customary 50 percent. Which still leaves us with 100,000 too many. "It's a lot to take on the government," Jaqua tells me. "If you're in class, it's tough to go to court hearings and conferences. It's taking time away from concentrating on graduating. But I guess I am happy to do it. Because it's a good cause. Though I definitely wish it never happened to me to begin with." Typically, I'd say stop being a crybaby; the law is the law. But in the case of Denver, the law isn't exactly the law. Denverites' will ignored In case anyone has forgotten, Denver residents - the same residents who just passed I-100 last week, making marijuana the city's lowest enforcement priority, by a 57 percent majority - passed a 2005 SAFER initiative that made the possession of small amounts of marijuana legal in the city. "It's still illegal in the city of Denver, because Denver's in Colorado," Denver District Attorney Mitch Morrissey once explained. And thanks for the geography lesson. In other words, Denver's DA isn't interested in what Denverites have to say on the issue. Now, some people out there - those who don't pay close attention to the workings of the city or who hit their bongs a bit too regularly - might actually be under the impression that Denver has decided to follow the will of citizens. You are sorely mistaken. So don't do it. "I guess I was under an impression that the law said I could carry," Jaqua explains. "I wasn't aware that state law could override county law. "And that's partly why I'm fighting this. What kick-started this was the fact that I would lose my financial aid over something so small. But there are laws that say I can carry 1 ounce of pot legally in Denver. So I should be able to do it." OK. I'm not not exactly convinced that anyone is confused. But there is another level to this case, and hundreds of others, that also makes little sense. Jaqua's lawyer, Brian Vicente, is busy filing motions. He's asked for a six-person jury trial. He tells me he recently received a toxicology report from the city on the confiscated marijuana. The toxicology report alone surely costs more than the entire $100 fine. What in this equation makes anyone believe these sorts of prosecutions are worthwhile? Are fewer people smoking marijuana in Denver because of a $100 ticket? Is the city gaining anything from moving forward with prosecutions that cost taxpayers - taxpayers who have already plainly stated they don't want to prosecute - thousands of dollars for every case? And why do we have initiatives in Denver if city officials simply ignore them anyway? You know, sometimes you have to wonder who exactly is smoking ganja around here.
The Denver Post
2 comments:
I am applaued at the numbers that are being eliminated from the eduational playing field due to the herbal smoke. I am a believer that those individuals who are denied an education because of a small amount of herbal smoke, should take it to the highest supreme court to have a right to get financial aid by eliminating the question of "drugs" on the application. How about those on legal prescriptions that students use?
4
通常坊間高 酒店兼職檔西餐廳情人套餐壹客就要花費五 酒店工作、六百元以上,甚至上千元,對於有荷包預算的情侶們無疑是大大的負擔。 酒店上班考量目前低靡景氣,加 寒假打工上今年七夕情人節是在平常日,為刺激買氣高雄麗尊酒店特 暑假打工別推出「經濟型情人自助餐每對990元」,23日前預 酒店PT約且付定金者可免費獲贈「純手工玫瑰巧戒」乙只;現點現做的 禮服酒店香煎美國沙朗牛排吃到飽」更是經濟實惠,僅限於8/26七夕情人節晚餐時 兼差段。七夕情人節還沒想好怎麼過嗎?趕 打工快把握機會!
台北酒店經紀酒店於8/26晚上推出「七夕夜~五星經濟情人 酒店經紀餐優惠專案」,每對只要990元(含一成服務費),此外 酒店打工,凡於8/23日前預約並付訂金者免費 酒店兼差獲贈「純手工玫瑰巧戒」乙只,更為小倆口的戀情喝花酒加溫!值得一提的是,「純手工玫瑰巧戒」交際應酬用比利時產地的白巧克力,經由隔水加熱法融解、降溫再粉味小火加熱等多道繁複製作過程才能完成戒台部份,玫瑰花亦使用白巧克力加上麥芽糖隔水加熱充份混合均勻後再冷卻一夜後方可塑形。
﹝含豐富鐵質的玫瑰海鹽也將牛排的鮮味更加提振,肉香四溢酒店喝酒沙朗牛排,每一口極具嚼勁,鮮嫩好吃。﹞
另外,以多國料理聞名的地球村自助餐廳提供多樣化精緻自助吧,無論 酒店是前菜、甜點、湯品、DIY擔仔麵、鮮蔬沙拉、鐵板燒等,提供豐富且多樣的菜式,讓喜愛自由用餐、歡樂氛圍的情侶們可以輕鬆大啖美食,不用擔心荷包大失血的顧慮。
Post a Comment